Em Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:41:25 +0200 Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:15:45AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:40:51 +0200 > > Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> escreveu: > > > > > The Makefiles were a free for all without a clear order defined. Sort all > > > the > > > options based on the Kconfig symbol. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Hi Mauro, > > > > > > Here is my makefile ordering patch again, this time with all the Makefiles > > > in drivers/media that needed ordering. > > > > > > Since we're already pretty late in the release period, I guess there won't > > > be any major conflicts between now and the merge window. > > > > > > > The thing with patches like that is that they almost never apply fine. > > By the time I review such patches, it was already broken. Also, > > once applied, it breaks for everybody that have pending work to merge. > > > > This patch is broken (see attached). > > > > So, I prefer not applying stuff like that. > > I had the feeling that now would have been a good time to merge it, > since all the PR should be merged I guess. But ok. No, there are drivers that were late-submitted, and whose commit (if driver gets accepted) will be after -rc1. If this patch gets applied, those drivers will have merge conflicts. There are also the cases where people have drivers under development. If they pull from my tree after a change like that, the developer will get conflicts. Thanks, Mauro
