On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 08:16:03AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:24:56PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >>
> >> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> Cc: Alan Cox <a...@linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> >> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> >
> > This appears to be the same as the patch I've applied previously.
> 
> Okay, sorry for the noise. I didn't see it in -next when I did my
> rebase this week.

No worries, it'll get there through mediatree... but it'll still take some
time (rc3 not there yet).

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi

Reply via email to