Kevin,
>> +/**
>> + * vpfe_disable_clock() - Disable clocks for vpfe capture driver
>> + * @vpfe_dev - ptr to vpfe capture device
>> + *
>> + * Disables clocks defined in vpfe configuration.
>> + */
>> static void vpfe_disable_clock(struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev)
>> {
>> struct vpfe_config *vpfe_cfg = vpfe_dev->cfg;
>> + int i;
>>
>> - clk_disable(vpfe_cfg->vpssclk);
>> - clk_put(vpfe_cfg->vpssclk);
>> - clk_disable(vpfe_cfg->slaveclk);
>> - clk_put(vpfe_cfg->slaveclk);
>> - v4l2_info(vpfe_dev->pdev->driver,
>> - "vpfe vpss master & slave clocks disabled\n");
>> + for (i = 0; i < vpfe_cfg->num_clocks; i++) {
>> + clk_disable(vpfe_dev->clks[i]);
>> + clk_put(vpfe_dev->clks[i]);
>
>While cleaning this up, you should move the clk_put() to module
>disable/unload time.
[MK] vpfe_disable_clock() is called from remove(). In the new
patch, from ccdc driver remove() function, clk_put() will be called.
Why do you think it should be moved to exit() function of the module?
>You dont' need to put he clock on every disable.
>The same for clk_get(). You don't need to get the clock for every
>enable. Just do a clk_get() at init time.
Are you suggesting to call clk_get() during init() and call clk_put()
from exit()? What is wrong with calling clk_get() from probe()?
I thought following is correct:-
Probe()
clk_get() followed by clk_enable()
Remove()
clk_disable() followed by clk_put()
Suspend()
clk_disable()
Resume()
clk_enable()
Please confirm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
