On 05/15/2018 09:16 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:

I'm curious about how you finally resolved to handle these issues.

I noticed Smatch is no longer reporting them.

There was no direct fix for it, but maybe this patch has something
to do with the smatch error report cleanup:

commit 3ad3b7a2ebaefae37a7eafed0779324987ca5e56
Author: Sami Tolvanen <samitolva...@google.com>
Date:   Tue May 8 13:56:12 2018 -0400

     media: v4l2-ioctl: replace IOCTL_INFO_STD with stub functions
This change removes IOCTL_INFO_STD and adds stub functions where
     needed using the DEFINE_V4L_STUB_FUNC macro. This fixes indirect call
     mismatches with Control-Flow Integrity, caused by calling standard
     ioctls using a function pointer that doesn't match the function type.
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolva...@google.com>
     Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hansv...@cisco.com>
     Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+sams...@kernel.org>


Thanks, Mauro.


Possibly...  There was an ancient bug in Smatch's function pointer
handling.  I just pushed a fix for it now so the warning is there on
linux-next.


Dan,

These are all the Spectre media issues I see smatch is reporting in linux-next-20180515:

drivers/media/cec/cec-pin-error-inj.c:170 cec_pin_error_inj_parse_line() warn: potential spectre issue 'pin->error_inj_args' drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ca_en50221.c:1479 dvb_ca_en50221_io_write() warn: potential spectre issue 'ca->slot_info' (local cap) drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_net.c:252 handle_one_ule_extension() warn: potential spectre issue 'p->ule_next_hdr'

I pulled the latest changes from the smatch repository and compiled it.

I'm running smatch v0.5.0-4459-g2f66d40 now. Is this the latest version?

I wonder if there is anything I might be missing.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Reply via email to