Hi! > > On Nokia N900, I have similar problems as Intel IPU3 hardware. > > > > Meeting notes say that pure software implementation is not fast > > enough, but that it may be useful for debugging. It would be also > > useful for me on N900, and probably useful for processing "raw" > > images > > from digital cameras. > > > > There is sensor part, and memory-to-memory part, right? What is > > the format of data from the sensor part? What operations would be > > expensive on the CPU? If we did everthing on the CPU, what would be > > maximum resolution where we could still manage it in real time? > > The IPU3 sensor produce a vendor specific form of bayer. If we manage > to implement support for this format, it would likely be done in > software. I don't think anyone can answer your other questions has no > one have ever implemented this, hence measure performance.
I believe Intel has some estimates.
What is the maximum resolution of camera in the current Dell systems?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
