W dniu 03.02.2010 00:32, hermann pitton pisze:
Hi Jean, Mauro and all,
Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 08:54 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
Hi Hermann,
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:47:53 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
Hi Jean,
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
Hi Hermann,
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:16:35 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
For now, I only faked a P7131 Dual with a broken IR receiver on a 2.6.29
with recent, you can see that gpio 0x40000 doesn't go high, but your
patch should enable the remote on that P7131 analog only.
I'm not sure why you had to fake anything? What I'd like to know is
simply if my first patch had any negative effect on other cards.
because I simply don't have that Asus My Cinema analog only in question.
To recap, you previously announced a patch, tested by Daro, claiming to
get the remote up under auto detection for that device and I told you
having some doubts on it.
My first patch was not actually tested by Daro. What he tested was
loading the driver with card=146. At first I thought it was equivalent,
but since then I have realized it wasn't. That's the reason why the
"Tested-by:" was turned into a mere "Cc:" on my second and third
patches.
Mauro prefers to have a fix for that single card in need for now.
Since nobody else cares, "For now", see above, I can confirm that your
last patch for that single device should work to get IR up with auto
detection in delay after we change the card such late with eeprom
detection.
The meaning of that byte in use here is unknown to me, we should avoid
such as much we can! It can turn out to be only some pseudo service.
If your call for testers on your previous attempt, really reaches some
for some reason, I'm with you, but for now I have to keep the car
operable within all such snow.
That I understand. What I don't understand is: if you have a
SAA7134-based card, why don't you test my second patch (the one moving
the call to saa7134_input_init1 to saa7134_hwinit2) on it, without
faking anything? This would be a first, useful data point.
sorry, the snow fall did not stop and we will need trucks next day to
get it out of town. No place left.
I did not reread any single line of code until now, but told you that
Roman has tested a equivalent patch on his P7131_ANALOG already and I
can confirm that it also had no side effects on a FlyVideo3000 card=2.
For now, I would at least need some time to see, if input_init can be
decoupled from all other hardware init, what you seem to suggest, and
looking closer to Mauro's concerns.
Thought you are asking for some test with a i2c remote next to confirm
your analysis there. No such card in any machine currently, but can be
done.
Cheers,
Hermann
Hi All,
If some tests on my machine could be helpfull just let me know.
Best regards
Darek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
