On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Devin Heitmueller <dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jarod Wilson <ja...@wilsonet.com> wrote: >> Looks sane to me, and really needs to get in ASAP. I'd even suggest we >> get it sent to stable, as these newer firmware HDPVR are pretty wonky >> with any current kernel. >> >> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> >> Reviewed-by: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> >> CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org > > Where did the process break down here? Taylor did this patch *months* > ago, and there has been absolutely no comment with why it wouldn't go > upstream. If he hadn't been diligent in pinging the ML repeatedly, it > would have been lost.
It looks like for some reason, the v3 patch got eaten. :\ http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/8183/ is the v2, in state Changes Requested, but you can see in the comments a mail that says v3 is attached, which contains the requested change (added s-o-b). A v3 patch object is nowhere to be found though. The patch *was* indeed attached to the mail though, I've got it here in my linux-media mailbox. So at least on this one, I think I'm blaming patchwork, but it would be good to better understand how that patch got eaten, and to know if indeed its happened to other patches as well. -- Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
