On 23.06.2016 00:08, Nick Dyer wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c 
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
> index 880c40b..841e045 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
> @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int sur40_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
>       sur40->vdev.queue = &sur40->queue;
>       video_set_drvdata(&sur40->vdev, sur40);
>  
> -     error = video_register_device(&sur40->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> +     error = video_register_device(&sur40->vdev, VFL_TYPE_TOUCH, -1);
>       if (error) {
>               dev_err(&interface->dev,
>                       "Unable to register video subdevice.");

As far as I could tell from looking at patch 1/9, the only visible
change for userspace will be the device name, so I'd be fine with this.

> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static int sur40_vidioc_enum_fmt(struct file *file, void 
> *priv,
>       if (f->index != 0)
>               return -EINVAL;
>       strlcpy(f->description, "8-bit greyscale", sizeof(f->description));
> -     f->pixelformat = V4L2_PIX_FMT_GREY;
> +     f->pixelformat = V4L2_TCH_FMT_TU08;

I would suggest to leave the pixel format as it is. Rationale: the data
really is greyscale image intensity data (as also evidenced by [1]), not
just a synthetic image, and changing the pixel format would break all
userspace tools.

[1] https://github.com/mkalten/reacTIVision/issues/3#issuecomment-99931807

Best, Florian
-- 
SENT FROM MY DEC VT50 TERMINAL

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to