> Certainly if you have code with an odd mix of styles it is much
> harder to read, and ultimately source code is for *humans* to
> understand. So enforcing a consistent style, even if it is not your
> own style, makes it much easier to follow!
It can. It doesn't always.
I've yet to see a coding style rule that can't profitably be broken in
at least a few cases ("profitably" here meaning, the breaking actually
improves rather than impairs readability). Truly did Emerson write
that "[a] foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds".
Readability is a fundamentally subjective thing, after all, and thus
brings all of the human layer's messy inconsistency with it.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
