Hi, I have read several times on this group that on linux systems by default IPv4 packets received by a host will be answered irrespective of which interface the packets are received on. For instance, if you have a multihomed linux host and you configure one IPv4 address, A, on say eth0 and another IPv4 address, B, on say eth1, then pings for B that are received on eth0 will be answered by the linux host.
Is the same true for IPv6 addresses? What I see on my Redhat FC4 PC (kernel version 2.6.11 according to /proc/version), is if I assign say 192.168.78.101/24 to eth0 and 192.168.78.105/24 to dummy0 and then ping 192.168.78.105 from another host connected to eth0, the PC answers the pings. But if I do the analogous thing with IPv6 addresses (in this case I assigned 2001::2/64 to eth0 and 2001::4/64 to dummy0) and try to ping6 from the connected host, the PC answers pings to 2001::2 but not those to 2001::4. Running ip neigh show on the other host (also a linux 2.6 system but not a PC) says: 2001::4 dev eth0 nud failed Running ethereal on the Redhat PC shows that the PC is receiving ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation packets from the other host containing ICMP type 135 target 2001::4, but shows no responses to these solicitations being transmitted. Is this the expected behavior? Is there some twiddling down in /proc that will make it respond to IPv6 addresses irrespective of received interface as with IPv4 addresses, or are the protocol specs just different in this regard? Thanks, Jeff Haran Brocade - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
