Linux-Networking Digest #744, Volume #10 Sun, 4 Apr 99 15:13:36 EDT
Contents:
Re: hackers ("D. C. & M. V. Sessions")
Re: newbie nic problem (Rien Broekstra)
Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network? ("Testing")
Re: Help: tunneling http through home firewall to internal server (Martin Ng)
Re: multiple masquerading (Christoph H.)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Nobody Here)
pppd connected but no ping (again) (Florian =?iso-8859-1?Q?L=E4ng?=)
Re: Help: tunneling http through home firewall to internal server (alex)
Adding header lines using command line mail program (Chris Severn)
Re: Sendmail smart relay question (Frank Hahn)
Re: getting my innd server fed, through ppp ("William Evans")
Re: Linux as NT server (Richard Pitt)
Re: winmodems (Richard Pitt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "D. C. & M. V. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: kingston.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: hackers
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 18:19:27 +0000
"David M. Cook" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 04 Apr 1999 05:14:32 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >sudden there's another process running "make whatis". I
>
> It's just a cronjob that runs weekly. Redhat should document these in their
> manual if they don't already. I remember working with slackware at 7:45 in
> the morning when the hard drive starting cranking away. I thought I'd been
> hacked. That's when slack scheduled the locate database update.
FWIW these kinds of now-and-then background jobs *should*
set themselves to priorities somewhere behind pathetic.
Given the habits of Linux users you certainly can't count
on time-of-day or -week to avoid collisions!
[Anyone else read Rick Cook's _The_Wizardry_Compiled_?
If you haven't, get the reprint from Baen -- two books
together called _The_Wiz_Biz_ Lethally funny with too
many in-jokes on hacker culture to save you from busting
a gut. Trust us on this.]
--
He either fears his fate too much, or his deserts are small,
That puts it not unto the touch to win or lose it all.
D. C. & M. V. Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Rien Broekstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie nic problem
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 01:48:29 +0200
George D. Brown wrote:
>
> when i go into linuxconfig and set up my info for eth0 i get erros when
> i exit. I think that the problem is the module for my nic...
>
> i am running rehat 5.2 and have a 3com fast etherlink XL 10/100 card.
> Please help.
> --Rugger
I have the same card and same distribution, but if you want me to help
you I need to know what error msgs you get...
--
Rien Broekstra L III N N U U X X
Tel: +31(0)735517594 L I N N N U U XX
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L I N N N U U XX
LLLLL III N N UUUU X X
------------------------------
From: "Testing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 18:29:02 GMT
Try eXceed, it's by far the fastest and most feature-filled of them all.
Costs money though, so be prepared to take out your pocketbook.
http://www.hcl.com
Cyrus Mehta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<7e1o6d$nd7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> Hi,
>
> I am creating a dual Windows/Linux environment using Samba for file
serving
> on a standard Ethernet network. I was wondering what kind of X server
software
> for the Windows side I could use to run some X windows apps off of the
LInux Box.
>
> Reliability is the most important factor, windows will crash often enough
without
> the help of the X server.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> CKM
>
>
------------------------------
From: Martin Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help: tunneling http through home firewall to internal server
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 01:39:24 +0800
Hi,
I can use ipportfw to forward the http request from my firewall to a
internal web server. However, the internal network can't browse the web
server.
Please help.
Martin
Greg Weeks wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "J. Mark Shacklette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I'd like to set up a linux firewall (ipfwadm) and have an http server
> > running on a box hidden behind the firewall (no public ip address). I'd
> > like to be able to set things up so that from the internet, I could
> > connect to the firewall (which has a public ip) and have it "foward"
> > http packets to the real http server, and have that server pass results
> > back through the firewall to my netscape client on the internet. I've
> > been told I want to use something like http tunneling, and that I can
> > somehow direct a particular port on the firewall to direct http requests
> > to the real internal http server.
> >
> > The only problem is that I have no earthly idea how to do this, or where
> > to start. Any and all suggestions, pointers to howtos and docs, etc.
> > would be most welcome and appreciated.
> >
> > I would also like to have ftp redirected as well. I guess another way
> > to put it is I'd like to be able to run an ftpd and httpd from a server
> > behind the firewall, but allow selected access to it from the internet.
>
> http is easy.
> -------------------------------------------------
> Question:
>
> I want to run a web server inside my Linux IP Masquerade firewall that
> can be accessed from the internet. How do I do this.
>
> Standard Answer:
>
> A pin hole allows incoming connection to go through a firewall to an
> internal machine for a specific service. There are two ways that I know
> of to open a pin hole in an IP Masq Linux firewall without proxying.
> Both are mentioned at the IP Masq resource page at
> http://ipmasq.cjb.net/ or http://www.tor.shaw.wave.ca/~ambrose/ They are
> redir and ipportfw. I tried redir first, and while it works and has the
> advantage that you can test it from inside the firewall it has the
> disadvantage that the logs on the web server show all connections as
> coming from the firewall. ipportfw is a kernel patch and a utility to
> change the kernel tables. It's advantages are it's faster and the logs
> show the correct source. It's biggest disadvantage is that it's only
> testable from outside the firewall. ipportfw information is at
> http://www.ox.compsoc.org.uk/~steve/portforwarding.html and redir is at
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/2288/redir_0.7.orig.tar.gz
> Any pin hole poses a security risk as it bypasses your firewall. Use
> them with care.
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> The FTP is more difficult. FTP needs two connections. I think the only
> way to do it would be with some sort of incoming proxy. I know FTP
> needs a proxy for outgoing connections also. The IP Masq in the kernel
> comes with the outgoing proxy. If you get it to work I'd be interested
> in hearing how. I also haven't spent much time looking at it for FTP.
>
> Greg Weeks
> --
> http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoph H.)
Subject: Re: multiple masquerading
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 18:26:19 GMT
Hi Guys
Sorry, but I am _sure_ that your ideas won't work, because the routing
is the problem (and I don't want to use 3 PCs for a job which could be
done by one).
So I tried source orientated routing with IPROUTE2 and IPCHAINS on top
of the routing for masquerading.
I think there is an incompatibility between IPROUTE2 and IPCHAINS.
Thanks anyway.
Regards,
Christoph.
Vienna/Austria.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S.: I want to do such a configuration, because the 3 internal LANs
belong to 3 different companies, and if someone connects to the
internet, everyone should see from which company the connection was
made (would avoid many troubles).
------------------------------
From: Nobody Here <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 11:33:18 -0700
Wesley W. Garland wrote:
> >> What about characters from 'The Lord of the Rings' ..?
> >>
> >> gandalf ... frodo ... sauron ... legolas ...
> >>
> >> Guess who's gonna be changing his /etc/hosts this afternoon ... :-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Desmond Coughlan |Restez zen ... Linux peut le faire
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [www site under construction]
> >
> >Certainly better than from "Lord of the Flies"... <grin>
>
WAY better than from :
"Lord of the Dance".... Flatley...Gillian....Areleen...Patrick....Shawn..<
big grin>
Doug
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 20:32:45 +0200
From: Florian =?iso-8859-1?Q?L=E4ng?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd connected but no ping (again)
Like several postings before I have a working ppp connection, but I cant
ping any remote server (100% lost packages). I guess its something with
wrong routing tables, but I dont know much about this as I am new to
linux. 'netstat -rn' gives
212.254.10.14 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 ppp0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 212.254.10.14 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0 pp0
Does this look ok?
The route /sbin/route program doesn't seem to exist on my RH linux 5.1.
Where can I get it?
I have a Zyxel omni.net LCD ISDN - Terminaladapter.
Following the ppp log :
Apr 4 19:43:40 localhost pppd[440]: pppd 2.3.3 started by Florian, uid
500
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: send (AT&FZE1X7^M)
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: expect (OK)
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: AT&FZE1X7^M^M
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: OK
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: -- got it
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: send (ATD0840840850^M)
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: expect (CONNECT)
Apr 4 19:43:41 localhost chat[441]: ^M
Apr 4 19:43:45 localhost chat[441]: ATD0840840850^M^M
Apr 4 19:43:45 localhost chat[441]: CONNECT
Apr 4 19:43:45 localhost chat[441]: -- got it
Apr 4 19:43:45 localhost chat[441]: send (\d)
Apr 4 19:43:46 localhost pppd[440]: Serial connection established.
Apr 4 19:43:47 localhost pppd[440]: Using interface ppp0
Apr 4 19:43:47 localhost pppd[440]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Apr 4 19:43:47 localhost pppd[440]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0xffff1507> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 4 19:43:47 localhost pppd[440]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <pcomp>
<accomp>]
Apr 4 19:43:47 localhost pppd[440]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <magic
0xffff1507>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0xb1ba2da5>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0xb1ba2da5>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <magic
0xffff1507>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="me"
password="mypass"]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 "Login
Succeeded"]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: Remote message: Login Succeeded
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress
VJ 0f 00> <addr 212.254.10.14>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <compress
VJ 0f 00> <addr 212.254.10.14>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
212.254.10.161>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
212.254.10.161> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
212.254.10.161> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: local IP address 212.254.10.161
Apr 4 19:43:48 localhost pppd[440]: remote IP address 212.254.10.14
Apr 4 19:46:48 localhost pppd[440]: Terminating on signal 15.
Apr 4 19:46:48 localhost pppd[440]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x3 "User
request"]
Apr 4 19:46:49 localhost pppd[440]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Apr 4 19:46:49 localhost pppd[440]: Modem hangup
Apr 4 19:46:49 localhost pppd[440]: Connection terminated.
Apr 4 19:46:50 localhost pppd[440]: Exit.
Thanks for helping
Florian
------------------------------
From: alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help: tunneling http through home firewall to internal server
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 20:29:19 +0200
Use the TIS Firewall toolkit
"J. Mark Shacklette" wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'd like to set up a linux firewall (ipfwadm) and have an http server
> running on a box hidden behind the firewall (no public ip address). I'd
> like to be able to set things up so that from the internet, I could
> connect to the firewall (which has a public ip) and have it "foward"
> http packets to the real http server, and have that server pass results
> back through the firewall to my netscape client on the internet. I've
> been told I want to use something like http tunneling, and that I can
> somehow direct a particular port on the firewall to direct http requests
> to the real internal http server.
>
> The only problem is that I have no earthly idea how to do this, or where
> to start. Any and all suggestions, pointers to howtos and docs, etc.
> would be most welcome and appreciated.
>
> I would also like to have ftp redirected as well. I guess another way
> to put it is I'd like to be able to run an ftpd and httpd from a server
> behind the firewall, but allow selected access to it from the internet.
>
> Any help would be most appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
------------------------------
From: Chris Severn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.mime
Subject: Adding header lines using command line mail program
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 02:40:43 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
I'm interested in running a mail sending program (such as mail,
fastmail, elm) on the command line, passing the body of the message
through stdin, but ensuring that the header of the message contains a
few particular lines - namely "Mime-Version: 1.0", "Content-Type:
application/octet-stream; name=thefile.gif", and
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64".
I've searched the man pages of "mail", "fastmail" and "elm", but they
don't seem to be able to do it. They can all be passed subject fields,
and an assortment of other fields such as "Reference", "Comments",
"From:" etc., but none seem to be able to be passed the exact fields I
want, or user defined fields.
Does anyone know a common mail program which can do it on the command
line under linux, or anything that I may have missed ?
Thanks.
To know why I want this - read on.
I am often sent .tif files by email from a fax to email gateway provided
by my telecommunications company. Tiff files are not easily read by
most integrated mail readers and other programs, so I want to convert
these emails to .gif format before sending them on for myself and my
friends to view. I have used my .procmailrc file on my linux shell
account with my ISP to do nearly everthing which I want. The extract
from my .procmailrc file follows :
| formail -I "" | mimencode -u >/tmp/convert.tmp ; tifftopnm
/tmp/convert.tmp | ppmtogif | mimencode | mail -s "Fax Received `date`"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; rm /tmp/convert.tmp
I use "formail" to strip off the headers, because "mimencode" doesn't
like anything but the mime message.
I use mimencode to decode the mail body to a .tif file.
I use tifftopnm and ppmtogif to convert from tif to a portable bitmap,
then from a portable bitmap to a gif. The reason I use a temporary file
here is that for some silly reason, tifftopnm doesn't like data from
stdin.
I use mimencode again to encode the .gif
Lastly, I use "mail" to send my message to whoever wants it (just me
during testing). I enter a subject line which tells me what time I
processed this message.
Then, I delete my temporary file.
All of this works wonderfully, and does exactly what it's meant to.
Except that the image at the other end can't be viewed or decoded
properly by windoze style email clients because there are no header
lines which tell it what type of encoding is used, or the filename (and
hence the resultant image type). This is why I need to enter the
correct lines regarding encoding into the header of the message. (I
assume the three lines I mention are the correct ones because those are
the ones I see in the incoming message from the fax-email gateway).
I'd appreciate any suggestions anyone may have.
Thanks.
Chris Severn.
--
Delete the 'x' to remove the spamblock.
Except spammers, for whom my email address is abuse@localhost
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Sendmail smart relay question
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 17:54:39 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 03 Apr 1999 10:28:38 GMT, Rino Perri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I need your help, please: I connect to the net through PPP and would
>like to use my ISP as smart relay host. I run sendmail 8.9.3 on linux
>slackware 3.6. I DO NOT have the same user name locally as I have
>at my ISP. I have modified my sendmail.cf as follows:
>
> # who I masquerade as (null for no masquerading)
> DMmyISP.net
>
> # "Smart" relay host (may be null)
> DSsmtp.myISP.net
>
>When I run 'sendmail -q' sendmail fails and I get an e-mail titled
>"Mail Delivery S (48) Returned Mail:
>Data format error" which states "501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Sender domain must exist." (where "rperri" is my local user name
>and "swift" is the name for my machine.)
>
>Obviously swift.myISP.net (myISP.net stands for my real ISP's name) is
>not considered a valid domain. Besides, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
not my e-mail (my email address being [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
You are better off starting with a *.mc file and not modifying
your /etc/sendmail.cf file.
Either way, you need to restart sendmail to make it re-read the
/etc/sendmail.cf file.
You need to look into using the genericstable feature. It maps
a local user name to an email address.
Here is a generic *.mc file I use on a Slackware system. You may
or may not need all of these things. You may need to add others.
I'll let you go through the sendmail documentation and figure
out what these things all do.
===========linux.mc======================
include(`../m4/cf.m4')
VERSIONID(`linux for smtp-only setup with procmail')dnl
OSTYPE(linux)
MASQUERADE_AS(yourisp.com)
FEATURE(genericstable)dnl
FEATURE(allmasquerade)dnl
FEATURE(nocanonify)dnl
FEATURE(always_add_domain)dnl
FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl
define(`confCON_EXPENSIVE', `True')dnl
define(`confHOSTS_FILE', `/etc/hosts')dnl
define(`confSERVICE_SWITCH_FILE', `/etc/service.switch')dnl
define(`SMTP_MAILER_FLAGS', `e')dnl
define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp:[smtp.yourisp.com]')dnl
MAILER(local)dnl
MAILER(smtp)dnl
===============end==========================
Also, there is a sendmail newsgroup where it is probably easier to
get help.
--
Frank Hahn
------------------------------
From: "William Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: getting my innd server fed, through ppp
Date: 04 Apr 1999 14:43:05 -0400
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin & Chelby Geiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> I'd like to set up a cron job which would log in in the middle of the
Kevin> night, and then do something to get my innd server fed about 10 text
Kevin> groups.
http://www.kvaleberg.com/newsx.html
Been working beautifully for me for a couple of years now.
--
William Evans < william . evans @ computer . org >
------------------------------
From: Richard Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as NT server
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 18:50:26 GMT
Greg Weeks wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Richard Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "William R. Mattil" wrote:
> >>
> >> Mogul 55 wrote:
> >>
> >> > i want linux to act as an NT server would. The clients are running Win 98.
> >> > The big thing is i want the linux box to validate the users that are on the Win
> >> > 98 PCs..
> >> > Some one please help
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> The easy part will be samba ......... the far more difficult part to try and
> >> duplicate will be the infamous "blue-screen-of-death". This is as far as I can
> >> tell a Micro$oft monopoly.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> --
> >> William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
> >> (972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
> >
> > Actually, it should be fairly easy to create a screen save that emulates
> > the BSOD. You could even throw in some random "interesting" text.
> > "System has become unstable - please re-boot with Linux"
> >
> > "System has become unstable - Bill Gates passed Go - please send $200"
> >
> > "System has become unstable - please re-install"
> >
> > you get the picture ;-)
>
> A little cron job that juggles random numbers and decides whether to
> die or not. Adjustable to suit how realistic you want it. If you want
> realism it occasionally does a mke2fs on your drive for you.
>
> Greg Weeks
> --
> http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
HMMMM.... I'm not sure this is all that realistic - it's more along the
lines of getting a virus. Maybe something that randomly injects changes
into /lib files might be more interesting. This would duplicate the
changes usually made to system .DLL files by software loaded by users.
I'm sure the pseudo randomness could be quite entertaining. Might even
get the system administration costs somewhere close to those I've seen
on a 'real' NT system ;-)
richard
--
Richard C. Pitt FirePlug Computers Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 604-465-2666
Internet Server Software - Tuning, Maintenance, Consulting
www.fireplug.net edge.fireplug.net - free firewall software
------------------------------
From: Richard Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: winmodems
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 18:53:34 GMT
John Hardin wrote:
>
> John Nelson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> >In the right environment, say a dial-up gateway server for a small office,
> >the el-cheapo Lucent chipset Winmodem would be a great fit. With CPU
> cycles
> >to spare, Linux should be able to handle modem emulation chores.
> >
> >Or is it too wimpy an OS for that?
> >
> ><ducking...>
>
> Ducking doesn't help much when they're shooting at your kneecaps...
>
> Seriously, I would expect Winmodem support to follow fairly quickly on the
> heels of specification release by the chipset vendors. Don't lose any sleep
> waiting for *that*, though.
>
> --
> John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
> PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> In the Lion
> the Mighty Lion
> the Zebra sleeps tonight...
> Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!
I for one hope nobody ever creates the software to run these incipid
little devils under Linux. Anybody that purchased one should demand a
refund as they are completely incapable of being reliable - depending as
they do on system load.
richard
--
Richard C. Pitt FirePlug Computers Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 604-465-2666
Internet Server Software - Tuning, Maintenance, Consulting
www.fireplug.net edge.fireplug.net - free firewall software
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
