From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] nilfs: exchange yield() on cond_resched() call in 
nilfs_transaction_lock() method

This patch exchanges yield() on cond_reshed() call in nilfs_transaction_lock() 
method. The comment of yield() recommends to use cond_reshed() as proper 
solution in the case of want to be 'nice' for others threads.

Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]>
---
 fs/nilfs2/segment.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
index a5752a58..8ced7e1 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static void nilfs_transaction_lock(struct super_block *sb,
                nilfs_segctor_do_immediate_flush(sci);
 
                up_write(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
-               yield();
+               cond_resched();
        }
        if (gcflag)
                ti->ti_flags |= NILFS_TI_GC;
-- 
1.7.9.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to