On Monday 13 July 2015 17:36:07 Michael Welling wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:02:44AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > I think nothing special. I just call: > > > > export ARCH=arm > > export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- > > make rx51_defconfig > > rm -f arch/arm/boot/zImage > > make -j12 zImage modules omap3-n900.dtb CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y > > cat arch/arm/boot/zImage arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb > > > arch/arm/boot/zImage.new > > mv arch/arm/boot/zImage.new arch/arm/boot/zImage > > > > Where are you getting rx51_defconfig from? > > This does not appear to be in the kernel source any longer. > > Can you try the above with omap2plus_defconfig? >
It is in my linux-n900 repository: https://github.com/pali/linux-n900 Repository contains more n900 specific patches but SPI code is unpatched https://github.com/pali/linux-n900/blob/HEAD/arch/arm/configs/rx51_defconfig Later in week I can try to compile also with omap2plus_defconfig... But in my opinion kernel should not crash with different configuration. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
