* Jamie Lokier <ja...@shareable.org> [100622 19:54]:
> Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >  __kuser_get_tls:                           @ 0xffff0fe0
> > -
> > -#if !defined(CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG) && !defined(CONFIG_TLS_REG_EMUL)
> > -   ldr     r0, [pc, #(16 - 8)]             @ TLS stored at 0xffff0ff0
> > -#else
> > -   mrc     p15, 0, r0, c13, c0, 3          @ read TLS register
> > -#endif
> > +   ldr     r0, [pc, #(20 - 8)]             @ software TLS set in 
> > 0xffff0ff4?
> > +   cmp     r0, #0                          @ hardware TLS if flag not set
> > +   mrceq   p15, 0, r0, c13, c0, 3          @ read hardware TLS register
> > +   ldrne   r0, [pc, #(12 - 8)]             @ software TLS val at 0xffff0ff8
> >     usr_ret lr
> > -
> > -   .rep    5
> > -   .word   0                       @ pad up to __kuser_helper_version
> > -   .endr
> > +   .word   0                               @ non-zero for software TLS
> > +   .word   0                               @ software TLS value
> 
> It'd be nice not to waste instructions checking for HWCAP_TLS on archs
> which definitely don't have it.  I guess it doesn't matter elsewhere;
> I'd expect this to be a warm path for some programs making extensive
> use of TLS (I haven't measured though).

OK, but let's try to figure out a way that does not add more ifdef else
code as that makes it harder to build support for multiple ARM cores.
 
> As it's only a single instruction, and the code is in a writable page
> already (copied at init), how about just patching the instruction
> when ELF_HWCAP is set?

Yeah that can be done for __kuser_get_tls if it's always writable.
But __switch_to is trickier because of the CONFIG_MMU ifdefs there.

What if we have optional __switch_to and __kuser_get_tls implementations
in the mm/proc-*.S files that get copied over the current locations
if implemented?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to