>From: Hiroshi DOYU [hiroshi.d...@nokia.com] >Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 12:27 AM >To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando >Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Kanigeri, Hari >Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in >alloc_iovm_area > >From: "ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <fernando.l...@ti.com> >Subject: RE: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in >alloc_iovm_area >Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:48:14 +0200 > >> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On >> Behalf Of Guzman Lugo, Fernando [fernando.l...@ti.com] >> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 10:51 PM >> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: hiroshi.d...@nokia.com; Kanigeri, Hari >> Subject: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in >> alloc_iovm_area >> >> From cc48c0adaee97c8385a356aefa5b64a51818b4fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095...@ti.com> >> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:28:24 -0500 >> Subject: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in >> alloc_iovm_area >> >> End address of the vm area is “start + bytes -1”, >> not “start + byte”. This patch fixes that issue by doing >> an inclusive comparison with tmp->da_start. This issue >> was preventing allocate an area of size exactly the same >> than the free area. I did no change the value of da_end >> of each vm area because it is used to get area size in >> several places. > >Ok for me. Is this patch against the latest?
not it isn't, but I don't think it could have issues applying. However I will resend it, base against the latest and include you ack. Regards, Fernando. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
