>>-----Original Message----- >>From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.ba...@nokia.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:46 PM >>To: Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) >>Cc: Gopinath, Thara; Samuel Ortiz; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; >>linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Tony >>Lindgren; Andrew Morton >>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h >> >>Hi, >> >>On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:10:22AM +0200, Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) >>wrote: >>>On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:03:44AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote: >>>>>>No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the >>>>>>register offset >>>>>>for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be >>>>>>0xd or 0xe. >>>>>>Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been >>>>>>changed to 0xe. >>>> >>>>Typo. Earlier we were using 0xe and in the new implementation it has >>>>been changed to 0xd. >>> >>>you're right, I'm not sure how I came up with that value since the TRM >>>shows 0x0e, maybe a copy&paste error. Will change patch 1. >> >>ok, it's because there's no register 0x0a. And I missed that when >>defined the register space. Good catch, thanks. I wonder why it didn't >>fail to write to that register address :-?
0xd is a valid register offset. Hence no crash. Anyways I saw your new patch. Looks ok to me. Regards Thara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
