On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Saturday 02 October 2010 08:07:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> > Same with this one - let's take it as is and address a couple of clean-ups
> > later.
>
> Guennadi,
> Thanks for taking them both.
>
> BTW, what are your intentions about the last patch from my series still left
> not commented, "SoC Camera: add support for g_parm / s_parm operations",
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg22887.html ?
Yes, taking that one too, thanks. I see it right, that I have to apply 3
of your patches: omap1 camera driver, ov6650 and default .[gs]_fmt for
soc_camera, the rest will go via the OMAP / ARM tree, right?
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > +static void omap1_videobuf_queue(struct videobuf_queue *vq,
> > > + struct videobuf_buffer *vb)
> > > +{
> > > + struct soc_camera_device *icd = vq->priv_data;
> > > + struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
> > > + struct omap1_cam_dev *pcdev = ici->priv;
> > > + struct omap1_cam_buf *buf;
> > > + u32 mode;
> > > +
> > > + list_add_tail(&vb->queue, &pcdev->capture);
> > > + vb->state = VIDEOBUF_QUEUED;
> > > +
> > > + if (pcdev->active) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Capture in progress, so don't touch pcdev->ready even if
> > > + * empty. Since the transfer of the DMA programming register set
> > > + * content to the DMA working register set is done automatically
> > > + * by the DMA hardware, this can pretty well happen while we
> > > + * are keeping the lock here. Levae fetching it from the queue
> >
> > "Leave"
>
> Yes, sorry.
>
> > > + * to be done when a next DMA interrupt occures instead.
> > > + */
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> >
> > superfluous braces
>
> I was instructed once to do a reverse in a patch against ASoC subtree (see
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg14863.html), but
> TBH, I can't find a clear enough requirement specified in the
> Documentation/CodingStyle, so I probably change my habits, at least for you
> subtree ;).
Nah, forget it, doesn't matter.
> > > +static void videobuf_done(struct omap1_cam_dev *pcdev,
> > > + enum videobuf_state result)
> > > +{
> > > + struct omap1_cam_buf *buf = pcdev->active;
> > > + struct videobuf_buffer *vb;
> > > + struct device *dev = pcdev->icd->dev.parent;
> > > +
> > > + if (WARN_ON(!buf)) {
> > > + suspend_capture(pcdev);
> > > + disable_capture(pcdev);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (result == VIDEOBUF_ERROR)
> > > + suspend_capture(pcdev);
> > > +
> > > + vb = &buf->vb;
> > > + if (waitqueue_active(&vb->done)) {
> > > + if (!pcdev->ready && result != VIDEOBUF_ERROR) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * No next buffer has been entered into the DMA
> > > + * programming register set on time (could be done only
> > > + * while the previous DMA interurpt was processed, not
> > > + * later), so the last DMA block, be it a whole buffer
> > > + * if in CONTIG or its last sgbuf if in SG mode, is
> > > + * about to be reused by the just autoreinitialized DMA
> > > + * engine, and overwritten with next frame data. Best we
> > > + * can do is stopping the capture as soon as possible,
> > > + * hopefully before the next frame start.
> > > + */
> > > + suspend_capture(pcdev);
> > > + }
> >
> > superfluous braces
>
> ditto.
>
> I'll address the issues when ready with my forementioned corner case fixes.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
