> -----Original Message----- > From: Cousson, Benoit > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:47 PM > > Hi Senthil, > > On 10/7/2010 8:16 AM, Guruswamy, Senthilvadivu wrote: > > > >> From: Premi, Sanjeev > >> > >>> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org > >>> > >>> From: Senthilvadivu Guruswamy<svad...@ti.com> > >>> > >>> Move init exit methods to its driver probe,remove. > >>> pdev member has to be maintained by its own drivers. > >> > >> [sp] How is this change related to hwmod mentioned in the > >> subject line? > > [Senthil] As part of the hwmod design, dispc is made as platform driver. > > Hence the dispc_init and dispc_exit has to be moved from core > "omapdisplay" > > Driver to "dss_dispc" platform driver. Pdev is the platform device > structure maintained in dss_dispc driver containing silicon specific info > like baseaddr, irqs of DISPC HW. > > It is still not a reason to put hwmod in the subject. That is valid for > most patches of this series. > You have to put the plaform name then the subsystem if this is related > to the OMAP arch directory, which is DSS, not hwmod DSS. > > In the case of DSS driver changes, then you should start with video: > DSS:, or maybe DSS is enough if there is no possible confusion. > > The goal of that is just to highlight in the subject what part of the > kernel you are changing, since the maintainers are not necessarily the > same. [Senthil] If "hwmod" is creating confusion, it could be removed. Is it an ack for this patch series considering that "change in the header" is the only comment to be incorporated?
> Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
