fernando.l...@ti.com wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo > > <x0095...@ti.com> wrote: > > > The device address is assigned by tidspbridge no need for > > that parameter anymore. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095...@ti.com> > > > > This would break the API with user-space, right? > > Yes, user-space needs to be changed accordingly.
Wouldn't it make sense to avoid stuffing so many changes at once including ABI breakage? Does user-space really _needs_ to be changed? Can't you just ignore that argument? > > I think this change should be delayed, preferably after we > > have a working tidspbridge. > > The issue you were seeing must be fixed with patch 2/8, and > Having all the dependencies tidspbridge has to be working > Properly. Yes, which might not happen at .37. If we revert the iommu stuff, we might have a chance at having a working bridge on .37. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
