On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote: > * Jean Pihet <jean.pi...@newoldbits.com> [101118 10:06]: >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote: >> >> About the DPLL lock: >> 1) wait_sdrc_ok is only called when back from the non-OFF modes, >> 2) I checked that when running wait_sdrc_ok the CORE is already out of >> idle and the DPLL is already locked. Note: l-o code has no support for >> the voltages OFF and the external clocks OFF. >> >> What to conclude from 1) and 2)? In my test setup ot looks like >> wait_sdrc_ok is of no use, but I agree this a premature conclusion. > > Yeah we should figure out in which cases wait_sdrc_ok is needed. > > BTW, are you sure you're hitting core idle in your tests? Yes it is OK from the console messages and the counters values in /debug/pm_debug/count.
Let me confirm asap with the PRCM registers dump. > > Regards, > > Tony > Thanks, Jean > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
