On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Todd Poynor <toddpoy...@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:29:30PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> TWL6030 devices have an interrupt line which is connected to
>> application processor like OMAP. These devices support multiple features
>> such as MMC card detect, USB cable detect, RTC interrupt, etc. that must
>> wake up the application processor.
>>
>> With this change, TWL6030 client drivers can make use of
>> irq_wake() if the wakeup is desirable on it's irq events.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilim...@ti.com>
>> cc: Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c |    9 +++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>> index eb3b5f8..4477134 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>> @@ -187,6 +187,13 @@ static inline void activate_irq(int irq)
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>
>> +int twl6030_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
>> +{
>> +     int twl_irq = (int)irq_get_chip_data(d->irq);
>> +
>> +     return irq_set_irq_wake(twl_irq, on);
>
> Note that when running with this previously, LOCKDEP warnings
> were seen.  LOCKDEP explicitly sets all irq_desc locks as a single
> lock-class, causing "possible recursive locking detected" when the TWL
> RTC (or other) driver calls through enable_irq_wake to
> twl6030_irq_set_wake, which recursively calls irq_set_irq_wake.
> Although the irq_desc and lock are different, LOCKDEP treats these as
> equivalent, presumably due to problems that can be incurred when
> locking more than one irq_desc.
>
> Currently we're running with twl6030_irq_set_wake keeping a count of
> sub-module wakeirqs, and setting the wakeup status for the twl_irq
> enabled or disabled as needed at suspend time.  Can send a patch if
> wanted.
>
Please do that.

Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to