Paul, On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Paul Walmsley <p...@pwsan.com> wrote: > Hi Jean > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote: > >> Figures are added to the power domains structs for RET and OFF modes. >> >> Note: the latency figures for MPU, PER, CORE, NEON have been obtained >> from actual measurements. >> The latency figures for the other power domains are preliminary and >> shall be added. >> >> Cf. >> http://www.omappedia.org/wiki/Power_Management_Device_Latencies_Measurement >> for a detailed explanation on where are the numbers magically coming from. >> >> Tested on OMAP3 Beagleboard in RET/OFF using wake-up latency constraints >> on MPU, CORE and PER. > > A few more question about these numbers. > > - Are these numbers the ones right off the hardware, or rounded, or > worst-case plus a certain percentage? All measurements results are the worst case values right from the hardware (HW and SW measurements on the target).
> > - What frequency/voltage were these measured at? OPP50 > > - Also, you mention OMAP3 Beagleboard. Is that 34xx or 36xx Beagleboard? 34xx Beagleboard Cf. http://www.omappedia.org/wiki/Power_Management_Device_Latencies_Measurement#cpuidle_results for the details. Regards, Jean > > - Paul > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
