Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav <vaibhav.be...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:23:35, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 && !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
>> missing omap2_mboxes declaration.
>>
> [...]
>>
>> -struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = { &mbox_dsp_info, &mbox_iva_info, NULL };
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
>> +struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = {
>> + &mbox_dsp_info,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
>> + &mbox_iva_info,
>> +#endif
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> #endif
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
>
> Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
I'll rebase/repost this series:
[PATCH 0/7] OMAP: mailbox: removing static declarations
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/59620
In the meantime I would appreciate comments.
Regards,
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
