Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> writes: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:07:49PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> >> >> Attempts to retrigger nested threaded IRQs currently fail because they >> have no primary handler. In order to support retrigger of nested >> IRQs, the parent IRQ needs to be retriggered. >> >> To fix, when an IRQ needs to be resent, if the interrupt has a parent >> IRQ and runs in the context of the parent IRQ, then resend the parent. >> >> Also, handle_nested_irq() needs to clear the replay flag like the >> other handlers, otherwise check_irq_resend() will set it and it will >> never be cleared. Without clearing, it results in the first resend >> working fine, but check_irq_resend() returning early on subsequent >> resends because the replay flag is still set. >> >> Problem discovered on ARM/OMAP platforms where a nested IRQ that's >> also a wakeup IRQ happens late in suspend and needed to be retriggered >> during the resume process. >> >> Reported-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> >> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> >> [khil...@ti.com: changelog edits, clear IRQS_REPLAY in handle_nested_irq()] >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > > Umm, we also have the converse situation. We have platforms where the > resend has to be done from the child IRQ, and the parent must not be > touched. I hope that doesn't break those.
I'm assuming the child IRQs you're concerned with are not threaded, right? This patch only addresses nested, threaded IRQs, and these don't have a primary handler to run at all, so cannot do any triggering. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
