On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 07:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Though making the rating of the dummy lower is definitely a good
> > thing, so a real hardware device which is detected later can replace
> > the dummy device. So yes, the rating should be low for the dummy
> > timer.
> >
> Exactly. As Mark pointed out, you have already applied Mark's patch.
> I was just wondering whether you can take the $subject patch as well
> with ack from Russell, Mark.
It can go through the ARM tree as well, no dependencies on my stuff.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
