On 10/25/2013 10:57 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> This patch adds support for TI divider clock binding, which simply uses
> the basic clock divider to provide the features needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/divider.txt       |   86 +++++++
>  drivers/clk/ti/Makefile                            |    3 +-
>  drivers/clk/ti/divider.c                           |  239 
> ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 327 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/divider.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/ti/divider.c
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/divider.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/divider.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..65e3dcd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/divider.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +Binding for TI divider clock
> +
> +Binding status: Unstable - ABI compatibility may be broken in the future
> +
> +This binding uses the common clock binding[1].  It assumes a
> +register-mapped adjustable clock rate divider that does not gate and has
> +only one input clock or parent.  By default the value programmed into
> +the register is one less than the actual divisor value.  E.g:
> +
> +register value               actual divisor value
> +0                    1
> +1                    2
> +2                    3
> +
> +This assumption may be modified by the following optional properties:
> +
> +ti,index-starts-at-one - valid divisor values start at 1, not the default
> +of 0.  E.g:
> +register value               actual divisor value
> +1                    1
> +2                    2
> +3                    3
> +
> +ti,index-power-of-two - valid divisor values are powers of two.  E.g:
> +register value               actual divisor value
> +0                    1
> +1                    2
> +2                    4
> +
> +Additionally an array of valid dividers may be supplied like so:
> +
> +     dividers = <4>, <8>, <0>, <16>;
ti,dividers I believe.

> +
> +Which will map the resulting values to a divisor table by their index:
> +register value               actual divisor value
> +0                    4
> +1                    8
> +2                    <invalid divisor, skipped>
> +3                    16
> +
> +Any zero value in this array means the corresponding bit-value is invalid
> +and must not be used.
> +
> +The binding must also provide the register to control the divider and
> +unless the divider array is provided, min and max dividers. Optionally
> +the number of bits to shift that mask, if necessary. If the shift value
> +is missing it is the same as supplying a zero shift.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : shall be "ti,divider-clock".

ti,composite-divider-clock undocumented?

> +- #clock-cells : from common clock binding; shall be set to 0.
> +- clocks : link to phandle of parent clock
> +- reg : offset for register controlling adjustable divider
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- clock-output-names : from common clock binding.
> +- ti,dividers : array of integers defining divisors
> +- ti,bit-shift : number of bits to shift the divider value, defaults to 0
> +- ti,min-div : min divisor for dividing the input clock rate, only
> +  needed if the first divisor is offset from the default value (1)
> +- ti,max-div : max divisor for dividing the input clock rate, only needed
> +  if ti,dividers is not defined.
> +- ti,index-starts-at-one : valid divisor programming starts at 1, not zero

makes sense only if ti,dividers are not defined, right?
CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED is used with !table

> +- ti,index-power-of-two : valid divisor programming must be a power of two

makes sense only if ti,dividers are not defined, right?
CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO is used with !table

> +- ti,autoidle-shift : bit shift of the autoidle enable bit for the clock
> +- ti,invert-autoidle-bit : autoidle is enabled by setting the bit to 0

These are part of auto idle driver bindings, so maybe give a link to that?

> +- ti,set-rate-parent : clk_set_rate is propagated to parent

yeah - this is one of those properties that should probably become
generic at a later point in time.

> +
> +Examples:
> +dpll_usb_m2_ck: dpll_usb_m2_ck@4a008190 {
> +     #clock-cells = <0>;
> +     compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
> +     clocks = <&dpll_usb_ck>;
> +     ti,max-div = <127>;
> +     reg = <0x190>;
> +     ti,index-starts-at-one;
> +};
> +
> +aess_fclk: aess_fclk@4a004528 {
> +     #clock-cells = <0>;
> +     compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
> +     clocks = <&abe_clk>;
> +     ti,bit-shift = <24>;
> +     reg = <0x528>;
> +     ti,max-div = <2>;
> +};

an example of ti,dividers will be useful as well.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/Makefile b/drivers/clk/ti/Makefile
> index a4a7595..640ebf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_OF),)
> -obj-y                                        += clk.o dpll.o autoidle.o 
> composite.o
> +obj-y                                        += clk.o dpll.o autoidle.o 
> divider.o \
> +                                        composite.o
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/divider.c b/drivers/clk/ti/divider.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..787bc8f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/divider.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
> +/*
> + * TI Divider Clock
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Texas Instruments, Inc.
> + *
> + * Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/clk/ti.h>
> +
> +static struct clk_div_table
> +__init *ti_clk_get_div_table(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +     struct clk_div_table *table;
> +     const __be32 *divspec;
> +     u32 val;
> +     u32 num_div;
> +     u32 valid_div;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     divspec = of_get_property(node, "ti,dividers", &num_div);
> +
> +     if (!divspec)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     num_div /= 4;
> +
> +     valid_div = 0;
> +
> +     /* Determine required size for divider table */
> +     for (i = 0; i < num_div; i++) {
> +             of_property_read_u32_index(node, "ti,dividers", i, &val);
> +             if (val)
> +                     valid_div++;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!valid_div) {
> +             pr_err("%s: no valid dividers for %s table\n", __func__,
> +                    node->name);
> +             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +     }
> +
> +     table = kzalloc(sizeof(*table) * (valid_div + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +     if (!table) {
> +             pr_err("%s: unable to allocate memory for %s table\n", __func__,
> +                    node->name);

you could drop this.

> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +     }
> +
> +     valid_div = 0;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < num_div; i++) {
> +             of_property_read_u32_index(node, "ti,dividers", i, &val);
> +             if (val) {
> +                     table[valid_div].div = val;
> +                     table[valid_div].val = i;
> +                     valid_div++;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return table;
> +}
> +
> +static int _get_divider_width(struct device_node *node,
> +                           const struct clk_div_table *table,
> +                           u8 flags)
> +{
> +     u32 min_div;
> +     u32 max_div;
> +     u32 val = 0;
> +     u32 div;
> +
> +     if (!table) {
> +             /* Clk divider table not provided, determine min/max divs */
> +             if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,min-div", &min_div)) {
> +                     pr_debug("%s: no min-div for %s, default=1\n",
> +                              __func__, node->name);
> +                     min_div = 1;
> +             }
> +
> +             if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,max-div", &max_div)) {
> +                     pr_err("%s: no max-div for %s!\n", __func__,
> +                            node->name);
> +                     return -EINVAL;

will be nice to get warning if ti,divider is defined and any of the
non-operational properties are defined as well.

> +             }
> +
> +             /* Determine bit width for the field */
> +             if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)
> +                     val = 1;
> +
> +             div = min_div;
> +
> +             while (div < max_div) {
> +                     if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
> +                             div <<= 1;
> +                     else
> +                             div++;
> +                     val++;
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             div = 0;
> +
> +             while (table[div].div) {
> +                     val = table[div].val;
> +                     div++;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return fls(val);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_ti_divider_clk_setup() - Setup function for simple div rate clock
> + */
> +static int __init of_ti_divider_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
> +                                       struct regmap *regmap)
> +{
> +     struct clk *clk;
> +     const char *clk_name = node->name;
> +     void __iomem *reg;
> +     const char *parent_name;
> +     u8 clk_divider_flags = 0;
> +     u8 width = 0;
> +     u8 shift = 0;
> +     struct clk_div_table *table = NULL;
> +     u32 val = 0;
> +     u32 flags = 0;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     parent_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &val)) {
> +             pr_err("%s: %s must have reg\n", __func__, clk_name);
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     reg = (void *)val;
> +
> +     if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,bit-shift", &val))
> +             shift = val;
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,index-starts-at-one"))
> +             clk_divider_flags |= CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED;
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,index-power-of-two"))
> +             clk_divider_flags |= CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO;
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,set-rate-parent"))
> +             flags |= CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> +
> +     table = ti_clk_get_div_table(node);
> +
> +     if (IS_ERR(table))
> +             return PTR_ERR(table);
> +
> +     ret = _get_divider_width(node, table, clk_divider_flags);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             goto cleanup;
> +
> +     width = ret;
> +
> +     clk = clk_register_divider_table_regmap(NULL, clk_name, parent_name,
> +                                             flags, reg, regmap, shift,
> +                                             width, clk_divider_flags, table,
> +                                             NULL);
> +
> +     if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +             of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
> +             ret = of_ti_autoidle_setup(node, regmap);

if this fails, table will be freed though, we have added provider and
registerd table_regmap, no?

> +     } else {
> +             ret = PTR_ERR(clk);
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!ret)
> +             return 0;
> +cleanup:
> +     kfree(table);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(divider_clk, "ti,divider-clock", of_ti_divider_clk_setup);
> +
> +static int __init of_ti_composite_divider_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
> +                                                  struct regmap *regmap)
> +{
> +     struct clk_divider *div;
> +     u32 val;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     div = kzalloc(sizeof(*div), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!div)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &val);

reg is a mandatory property, no? error checks?

> +     div->reg = (void *)val;
> +     div->regmap = regmap;
> +
> +     div->table = ti_clk_get_div_table(node);
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,index-starts-at-one"))
> +             div->flags |= CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED;

alright, this does not really map back to ti,divder-clock style
handling.. aren't they supposed to be consistent?
how about "ti,index-power-of-two", bit shift etc?
> +
> +     ret = _get_divider_width(node, div->table, div->flags);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             goto cleanup;
> +
> +     div->width = ret;
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,bit-shift", &val)) {
> +             pr_debug("%s: missing bit-shift property for %s, default=0\n",
> +                      __func__, node->name);
> +             val = 0;
> +     }
> +     div->shift = val;
> +
> +     ret = ti_clk_add_component(node, &div->hw, CLK_COMPONENT_TYPE_DIVIDER);
> +     if (!ret)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +cleanup:
> +     kfree(div);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(ti_composite_divider_clk, "ti,composite-divider-clock",
> +            of_ti_composite_divider_clk_setup);
> 


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to