On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:53:14PM +0100, Michael Petlan wrote:
SNIP
> +
> + ../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "PERF-ANNOTATE" "NAME" "SYNOPSIS"
> "DESCRIPTION" "OPTIONS" "SEE ALSO" < basic_helpmsg.log
> + CHECK_EXIT_CODE=$?
> + ../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "perf\-annotate \- Read perf.data
> .* display annotated code" < basic_helpmsg.log
> + (( CHECK_EXIT_CODE += $? ))
> + ../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "input" "dsos" "symbol" "force"
> "verbose" "dump-raw-trace" "vmlinux" "modules" < basic_helpmsg.log
> + (( CHECK_EXIT_CODE += $? ))
> + ../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "print-line" "full-paths" "stdio"
> "tui" "cpu" "source" "symfs" "disassembler-style" < basic_helpmsg.log
> + (( CHECK_EXIT_CODE += $? ))
> + ../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "objdump" "skip-missing" "group"
> < basic_helpmsg.log
> + (( CHECK_EXIT_CODE += $? ))
I know it's probably PITA, but would it make sense to preceed
each line with the actuall line you are expecting? like:
###
# perf-annotate - Read perf.data (created by perf record) and display
annotated code
#
../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "perf\-annotate \- Read perf.data
.* display annotated code" < basic_helpmsg.log
(( CHECK_EXIT_CODE += $? ))
###
# Disassembly of section load0:
# │ Disassembly of section load0:
# 16.67 │ xor %eax,%eax
#
../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "$REGEX_HEADER load"
"$REGEX_LINE" "$REGEX_SECTION__TEXT" < basic_annotate.log
CHECK_EXIT_CODE=$?
###
# from = atol (argv[1]);
#
../common/check_all_patterns_found.pl "main" "from = atol" "from =
20L;" "for\s*\(i = 1L; j; \+\+i\)" "return 0;" < basic_annotate.log
(( CHECK_EXIT_CODE += $? ))
or some other way that would make it easy to find out what
the check is looking for in general
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
