Moshe Yudkowsky wrote: > So if I understand you correctly, you're stating that current the most > reliable fs in its default configuration, in terms of protection against > power-loss scenarios, is XFS?
I wouldn't go that far without some real-world poweroff testing, because various fs's are probably more or less tolerant of a write-cache evaporation. I suppose it'd depend on the size of the write cache as well. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
