Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 10:09 Sun 01 Nov     , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote:
>> Report SA MAD Class specific status.
>>
>> Fixes wrong error report for SA query status.
> 
> I agree with patch, but one comment is below.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <e...@voltaire.com>
>> ---
>>  infiniband-diags/src/saquery.c |   41 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/infiniband-diags/src/saquery.c b/infiniband-diags/src/saquery.c
>> index 6c44b63..71823d5 100644
>> --- a/infiniband-diags/src/saquery.c
>> +++ b/infiniband-diags/src/saquery.c
>> @@ -124,6 +124,41 @@ int requested_lid_flag = 0;
>>  uint64_t requested_guid = 0;
>>  int requested_guid_flag = 0;
>>  
>> +#define SA_ERR_UNKNOWN IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_PRIO_SUGGESTED
>> +
>> +const char *ib_sa_error_str[] = {
>> +    "SA_NO_ERROR",
>> +    "SA_ERR_NO_RESOURCES",
>> +    "SA_ERR_REQ_INVALID",
>> +    "SA_ERR_NO_RECORDS",
>> +    "SA_ERR_TOO_MANY_RECORDS",
>> +    "SA_ERR_REQ_INVALID_GID",
>> +    "SA_ERR_REQ_INSUFFICIENT_COMPONENTS",
>> +    "SA_ERR_REQ_DENIED",
>> +    "SA_ERR_STATUS_PRIO_SUGGESTED",
>> +    "SA_ERR_UNKNOWN"
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline const char *ib_sa_err_str(IN uint8_t status)
>> +{
>> +    if (status > SA_ERR_UNKNOWN)
>> +            status = SA_ERR_UNKNOWN;
>> +    return (ib_sa_error_str[status]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void report_err(int status)
>> +{
>> +    int st = status & 0xff;
>> +
>> +    if (st)
>> +            fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Query result returned: %s (0x%x)\n",
>> +                    ib_get_err_str(st), status);
>> +    st = status >> 8;
>> +    if (st)
>> +            fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Query result returned: %s (0x%x)\n",
>> +                    ib_sa_err_str(st), status);
> 
> Such two identical messages with different error strings seems
> confusing to me. Wouldn't it be better to merge it in a single line,
> like:
> 
>       ERROR: Query result returned 0xNNNN: SM blah1 , SA blah2
> 
> (or similar), with making each part optional.

I agree.
Is it possible according to the spec to have both SM and SA (i don't think so)

Eli

> 
> Sasha
> 
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int sa_query(struct bind_handle *h, uint8_t method,
>>                  uint16_t attr, uint32_t mod, uint64_t comp_mask,
>>                  uint64_t sm_key, void *data)
>> @@ -794,8 +829,7 @@ static int get_any_records(bind_handle_t h,
>>      }
>>  
>>      if (result.status != IB_SUCCESS) {
>> -            fprintf(stderr, "Query result returned: %s\n",
>> -                    ib_get_err_str(result.status));
>> +            report_err(result.status);
>>              return result.status;
>>      }
>>  
>> @@ -1009,8 +1043,7 @@ static int get_print_class_port_info(bind_handle_t h)
>>              return ret;
>>      }
>>      if (result.status != IB_SUCCESS) {
>> -            fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Query result returned: %s\n",
>> -                    ib_get_err_str(result.status));
>> +            report_err(result.status);
>>              return (result.status);
>>      }
>>      dump_results(&result, dump_class_port_info);
>> -- 
>> 1.5.5
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to