> This workaround presented in 58d74bb is not something we should alert the > user > on. Debug level message is enough.
Not sure I agree ... surely the point of this message is for the user to see it and know to update firmware? Otherwise why print anything at all, since I'm sure you guys have already fixed the firmware and have a regression test so this bug doesn't reappear? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
