On 12/01/2014 14:41, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.h
@@ -48,11 +48,21 @@ struct iser_tx_desc {
struct ib_send_wr send_wr;
} __packed;
+struct pi_context {
+ struct ib_mr *prot_mr;
+ bool prot_key_valid;
+ struct ib_fast_reg_page_list *prot_frpl;
+ struct ib_mr *sig_mr;
+ bool sig_key_valid;
+};
+
struct fast_reg_descriptor {
- struct list_head list;
- struct ib_mr *data_mr;
- struct ib_fast_reg_page_list *data_frpl;
- bool valid;
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct ib_mr *data_mr;
+ bool data_key_valid;
+ struct ib_fast_reg_page_list *data_frpl;
+ bool protected;
no need for many bools in one structure... each one needs a bit,
correct? so embed them in one variable
I figured it will be more explicit this way. protected boolean
indicates if we should check the data-integrity status, and the other
3 indicates if the relevant MR is valid (no need to execute local
invalidation). Do you think I should compact it somehow? usually
xxx_valid booleans will align together although not always.
I didn't note there are so many booleans there... sure, my personal
preference is compaction, e.g have one field names flags and multiple
bit locations marking the different flags e.g
FAST_REG_DESC_VALID
FAST_REG_DESC_DATA_KEY_VALID
FAST_REG_DESC_PROTECTED
etc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
