On 04/15/2019 02:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>>>>>> According to the R-Car Gen3 Hardware Manual Rev 1.50 of Nov 30, 2018, 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> TX clock internal delay mode isn't supported on R-Car E3 (r8a77990) or 
>>>>>>>> D3
>>>>>>>> (r8a77995). And by extension it is also not supported by RZ/G2E 
>>>>>>>> (r9a774c0).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This matches all ES versions of the affected SoCs as it is
>>>>>>>> not clear if this problem will be resolved in newer chips.
>>>>>>>> This can be revisited, as necessary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch does not error-out if PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID or
>>>>>>>> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID are used on SoCs where TX clock delay
>>>>>>>> mode is not supported as there is a risk of introducing a regression
>>>>>>>> when used in conjunction with older DT blobs present in the field.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Simon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it should at least WARN_ON(). Such blobs are broken, even if
>>>>>>> they do kind of work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Good idea! Simon, third time's a charm? :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, can do.
>>>>
>>>> How about something like this?
>>>>
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>>>> @@ -1980,8 +1987,14 @@ static void ravb_set_delay_mode(struct net_device 
>>>> *ndev)
>>>>            set |= APSR_DM_RDM;
>>>>  
>>>>    if (priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID ||
>>>> -      priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID)
>>>> -          set |= APSR_DM_TDM;
>>>> +      priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) {
>>>> +          if (soc_device_match(ravb_delay_mode_quirk_match))
>>>> +                  dev_warn(ndev->dev.parent,
>>>> +                           "phy-mode %s requires TX clock internal delay 
>>>> mode which is not supported by this hardwre revision",
>>>> +                           phy_modes(priv->phy_interface));
>>>
>>> Hi Simon
>>>
>>> The point of the warning is to tell users they should upgrade their DT
>>> blob to one that is not broken. So i think the message should say
>>> this. Also, we want users to notice this, which is why i said
>>> WARN_ON(). Something big so it gets noticed.
>>
>>    I agree in general but I guess you meant WARN() -- WARN_ON() doesn't take
>> a string arg...
> 
> Thanks, how about this?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 4f648394e645..9618c4881c83 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -1980,8 +1987,12 @@ static void ravb_set_delay_mode(struct net_device 
> *ndev)
>               set |= APSR_DM_RDM;
>  
>       if (priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID ||
> -         priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID)
> -             set |= APSR_DM_TDM;
> +         priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) {
> +             if (!WARN(soc_device_match(ravb_delay_mode_quirk_match),
> +                       "phy-mode %s requires TX clock internal delay mode 
> which is not supported by this hardware revision. Please update device tree",
> +                       phy_modes(priv->phy_interface)))
> +                     set |= APSR_DM_TDM;
> +     }
>  
>       ravb_modify(ndev, APSR, APSR_DM, set);
>  }

   Looks fine, thanx! :-)

MBR, Sergei

Reply via email to