On 03/08/2013 03:59 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
This driver is for the FIMC-IS IP available in Samsung Exynos5
SoC onwards. This patch adds the core files for the new driver.

Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K<arun...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kilyeon Im<kilyeon...@samsung.com>
---
  drivers/media/platform/exynos5-is/fimc-is-core.c |  421 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/media/platform/exynos5-is/fimc-is-core.h |  140 +++++++
  2 files changed, 561 insertions(+)
[...]
+static int __devinit fimc_is_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

You need to remove this attribute, that's not supported in recent kernels
any more.

+{
+       struct device *dev =&pdev->dev;
+       struct fimc_is_platdata *pdata;
+       struct resource *res;
+       struct fimc_is *is;
+       struct pinctrl *pctrl;
+       void __iomem *regs;
+       int irq, ret;
+
+       pr_debug("FIMC-IS Probe Enter\n");
+
+       pctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(dev);
+       if (IS_ERR(pctrl)) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Pinctrl configuration failed\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }

This is not needed any more. If you work with not latest kernel I suggest
to cherry pick

commit ab78029ecc347debbd737f06688d788bd9d60c1d
drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core

and remove those devm_pinctrl_get_select_default() calls from drivers.

+       if (!pdev->dev.of_node) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Null platform data\n");

Huh ? Since this driver is for dt-only platforms, is there a need to check
pdev->dev.of_node at all ? Probably you want to just return -ENODEV if it
is NULL.

+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       pdata = fimc_is_parse_dt(dev);
+       if (!pdata) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Parse DT failed\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       is = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*is), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!is)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       is->pdev = pdev;
+
+       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+       regs = devm_request_and_ioremap(dev, res);
+       if (regs == NULL) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Failed to obtain io memory\n");
+               return -ENOENT;
+       }
+
+       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+       if (irq<  0) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n");
+               return irq;
+       }
+
+       ret = fimc_is_clk_cfg(is);
+       if (ret<  0) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Clock config failed\n");
+               goto err_clk;
+       }
+
+       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, is);
+       pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+
+       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
+       if (ret<  0)
+               goto err_clk;
+
+       is->alloc_ctx = vb2_dma_contig_init_ctx(dev);
+       if (IS_ERR(is->alloc_ctx)) {
+               ret = PTR_ERR(is->alloc_ctx);
+               goto err_pm;
+       }
+
+       /* Create sensor subdevs */
+       is->pdata = pdata;
+       ret = fimc_is_create_sensor_subdevs(is);
+       if (ret<  0)
+               goto err_sensor_sd;
+
+       /* Init FIMC Pipeline */
+       ret = fimc_is_pipeline_init(&is->pipeline, 0, is);
+       if (ret<  0)
+               goto err_sd;
+
+       /* Init FIMC Interface */
+       ret = fimc_is_interface_init(&is->interface, regs, irq);
+       if (ret<  0)
+               goto err_sd;
+
+       dev_dbg(dev, "FIMC-IS registered successfully\n");

Shouldn't there be pm_runtime_put() ?

+
+       return 0;
+
+err_sd:
+       fimc_is_pipeline_destroy(&is->pipeline);
+err_sensor_sd:
+       fimc_is_unregister_sensor_subdevs(is);
+err_vb:
+       vb2_dma_contig_cleanup_ctx(is->alloc_ctx);
+err_pm:
+       pm_runtime_put(dev);
+err_clk:
+       fimc_is_clk_put(is);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+int fimc_is_clk_enable(struct fimc_is *is)
+{
+       clk_enable(is->clock[IS_CLK_GATE0]);
+       clk_enable(is->clock[IS_CLK_GATE1]);

No need to check return value ?

+       return 0;
+}
+
+void fimc_is_clk_disable(struct fimc_is *is)
+{
+       clk_disable(is->clock[IS_CLK_GATE0]);
+       clk_disable(is->clock[IS_CLK_GATE1]);
+}
+
+static int fimc_is_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+       struct fimc_is *is = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = fimc_is_clk_enable(is);
+       if (ret<  0)
+               dev_err(dev, "Could not enable clocks\n");
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int fimc_is_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+       struct fimc_is *is = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+       fimc_is_clk_disable(is);
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int fimc_is_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+       return fimc_is_pm_resume(dev);
+}
+
+static int fimc_is_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+       return fimc_is_pm_suspend(dev);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int fimc_is_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+       return fimc_is_pm_resume(dev);
+}
+
+static int fimc_is_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+       return fimc_is_pm_suspend(dev);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
+
+static int fimc_is_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       struct fimc_is *is = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+       struct device *dev =&pdev->dev;
+
+       pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+       pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
+       fimc_is_pipeline_destroy(&is->pipeline);
+       fimc_is_unregister_sensor_subdevs(is);
+       vb2_dma_contig_cleanup_ctx(is->alloc_ctx);
+       fimc_is_clk_put(is);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_device_id fimc_is_driver_ids[] = {
+       {
+               .name           = "exynos5-fimc-is",
+               .driver_data    = 0,

This line doesn't change anything, I would just remove it.
But is this fimc_is_driver_ids[] array needed at all ?

+       },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, fimc_is_driver_ids);
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops fimc_is_pm_ops = {
+       SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(fimc_is_suspend, fimc_is_resume)
+       SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(fimc_is_runtime_suspend, fimc_is_runtime_resume,
+                          NULL)
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver fimc_is_driver = {
+       .probe          = fimc_is_probe,
+       .remove         = fimc_is_remove,
+       .id_table       = fimc_is_driver_ids,
+       .driver = {
+               .name   = FIMC_IS_DRV_NAME,
+               .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
+               .pm     =&fimc_is_pm_ops,

How is this driver instantiated from the device tree when there
is no of_match_table ? I didn't find any chunk adding it further
in this series.

+       }
+};
+module_platform_driver(fimc_is_driver);

I forgot to say that in general this patch series looks very clean
to me. I'm really happy to see this driver in such a good shape.

Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to