On Tue, 08 May 2007 14:24:32 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> However, could we compromise and just add TRUE = true, FALSE = false to
> the enum?

That sounds sane.  But I don't recall all the details of the discussion
and perhaps I'm missing something.

I think the whole bool/true/false thing is pretty dissatisfactory really. 
Java gets this right and C cannot and will not and we end up with people
using true and false as plain old "1" and "0".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to