On 06/24/2014 12:00 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > On 06/24/2014 11:30 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:27:46PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >>> This condition only matters in the bidi case, which is not relevant for the >>> PI case. >>> I suggested to condition that in libiscsi (posted in the second thread, >>> copy-paste below). >>> Although I do agree that scsi_transfer_length() helper is not really just >>> for PI and not more. >>> I think Mike's way is cleaner. >> >> But for bidi there are two transfers. So either scsi_transfer_length() >> needs to take the scsi_data_buffer, or we need to avoid using it. >> >> For 3.16 I'd prefer something like you're patch below. This patch which >> has been rushed in last minute and not through the scsi tree has already >> causes enough harm. If you can come up with a clean version to >> transparently handle the bidi case I'd be happy to pick that up for >> 3.17. >> >> In the meantime please provide a version of the patch below with a >> proper description and signoff. >> > > It would be nice to just have one function to call and it just do the > right thing for the drivers. I am fine with Sagi's libiscsi patch for > now though: > > Acked-by: Mike Christie <micha...@cs.wisc.edu>
Actually, let me take this back for a second. I am not sure if that is right. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
