HI
How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings
in my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the series?
On 10/01/2015 04:34 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
---
phy-exynos-ufs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
index 343fcaf..835ee78 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool match_cfg_to_pwr_mode(u8 desc, u8 required_pwr)
return false;
}
-int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr)
+static int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8
pwr)
{
struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
struct exynos_ufs_phy_cfg **cfgs = ufs_phy->cfg;
@@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ out:
return 0;
}
-void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
+static void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
{
struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
ufs_phy->lane_cnt = lane_cnt;
}
-int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
+static int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
{
struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
const unsigned int timeout_us = 100000;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
