On 05/24/2016 09:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:25:05AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
+static inline long h_send_crq(struct ibmvscsis_adapter *adapter,
+                       u64 word1, u64 word2)
+{
+       long rc;
+       struct vio_dev *vdev = adapter->dma_dev;
+
+       pr_debug("ibmvscsis: ibmvscsis_send_crq(0x%x, 0x%016llx, 0x%016llx)\n",
+                       vdev->unit_address, word1, word2);
+

As Joe Perches already asked, please define pr_fmt() instead of including
the kernel module name in every pr_debug() statement.

Even better, as this is a driver, it should be using dev_*() calls
instead of pr_*() calls to properly identify the device and driver that
is making the message.  No driver should be using pr_*() except in
_very_ limited usages.

Hi Greg,

The reason I recommended pr_debug() is because ibmvscsis is a LIO target driver and I don't think a struct device is associated with a LIO target driver. See e.g. target_register_template() in drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to