On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:27:48PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> Add attribute type that displays underlay storage type technology
> EMMC, UFS, and attribute id, that displays underlay storage device id.
> For EMMC this would be content of CID and for UFS serial number from
> the device descriptor.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> ---
> V2: resend
> V3: set kernel version to 4.7
> V4: update target date to Maj
> V5: adjust date and kernel version
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb | 24 ++++++++++++
> drivers/char/rpmb/core.c | 63
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb
> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb
> index 3ffcd2d1f683..7ca97d86bd97 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb
> @@ -18,3 +18,27 @@ Contact: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> Description:
> The /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN directory is created for
> each RPMB registered device
> +
> +What: /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN/id
> +Date: Aug 2016
> +KernelVersion: 4.8
> +Contact: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> +Description:
> + The /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN/id file contains device id
> + in a binary form
Oops, missed that you added these in a later patch, sorry about comment
on patch 2.
binary attribute? Why?
> +
> +What: /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN/type
> +Date: Aug 2016
> +KernelVersion: 4.8
> +Contact: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> +Description:
> + The /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN/type file contains device
> + underlay storage type technology: EMMC, UFS
> +
What is this used for?
> +What: /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN/reliable_wr_cnt
> +Date: Aug 2016
> +KernelVersion: 4.8
> +Contact: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> +Description:
> + The /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN/reliable_wr_cnt file contains
> + number of blocks that can be written in a single request
Why is this needed? Shouldn't the normal block device export this type
of information?
> diff --git a/drivers/char/rpmb/core.c b/drivers/char/rpmb/core.c
> index ff10cbb7b644..63271c7ed072 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/rpmb/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/rpmb/core.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,67 @@ struct rpmb_dev *rpmb_dev_find_by_device(struct device
> *parent)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpmb_dev_find_by_device);
>
> +static ssize_t type_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct rpmb_dev *rdev = to_rpmb_dev(dev);
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + switch (rdev->ops->type) {
> + case RPMB_TYPE_EMMC:
> + ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "EMMC\n");
It's a sysfs file, no need for scnprintf() crap, just use sprintf()
please.
> + break;
And the code can be made smaller by just doing:
return sprintf(buf, "EMMC\n");
:)
> + case RPMB_TYPE_UFS:
> + ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "UFS\n");
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "UNKNOWN\n");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(type);
> +
> +static ssize_t id_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct rpmb_dev *rdev = to_rpmb_dev(dev);
> + size_t sz = min_t(size_t, rdev->ops->dev_id_len, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + if (!rdev->ops->dev_id)
> + return 0;
> +
> + memcpy(buf, rdev->ops->dev_id, sz);
>
Hm, no. That's not how a binary attribute works. If you want a binary
attribute, use that type, don't put binary data in a "normal" sysfs
file.
> + return sz;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(id);
> +
> +static ssize_t reliable_wr_cnt_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct rpmb_dev *rdev = to_rpmb_dev(dev);
> +
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", rdev->ops->reliable_wr_cnt);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(reliable_wr_cnt);
> +
> +static struct attribute *rpmb_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_type.attr,
> + &dev_attr_id.attr,
> + &dev_attr_reliable_wr_cnt.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group rpmb_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = rpmb_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group *rpmb_attr_groups[] = {
> + &rpmb_attr_group,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> /**
> * rpmb_dev_unregister - unregister RPMB partition from the RPMB subsystem
> *
> @@ -377,6 +438,8 @@ struct rpmb_dev *rpmb_dev_register(struct device *dev,
> dev_set_name(&rdev->dev, "rpmb%d", id);
> rdev->dev.class = &rpmb_class;
> rdev->dev.parent = dev;
> + rdev->dev.groups = rpmb_attr_groups;
Nice job with the group, thanks for doing that.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
