On 2017年03月30日 16:48, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Hi Xiubo & Co,

On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 17:07 +0800, lixi...@cmss.chinamobile.com wrote:
From: Xiubo Li <lixi...@cmss.chinamobile.com>

Changed for V5:
- This only includes #1 and #2. And for old #3, #4 are still reviewing.
- #1, since the issue reported by Ilias is a separate new one, and will
   create a new patch later.
- #2, address the issue pointed out by Mike, thanks.
- #1 and #2 have been tested by Ilias in BIDI case, thanks.

Changed for V4:
- re-order the #3, #4 at the head.
- merge most of the #5 to others.

Xiubo Li (2):
   tcmu: Fix possible overwrite of t_data_sg's last iov[]
   tcmu: Fix wrongly calculating of the base_command_size

  drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Applied to target-pending/master, along with CC's for 3.19.y stable.

Thanks Xiubo !

Btw, I fixed-up the ordering of the Reviewed-by + Tested-by +
Signed-off-by tags on the patches here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git/commit/?id=ab22d2604c86ceb01bb2725c9860b88a7dd383bb
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git/commit/?id=abe342a5b4b5aa579f6bf40ba73447c699e6b579

Just for future reference, the flow of these tags should reflect the
history of the patch.  Eg:

Reviewed-by: First reviewer <f...@bar.com>
Tested-by: First tester <f...@bar2.com>
Reviewed-by: Second reviewer <f...@bar3.com>
Signed-off-by: Patch Author <y...@yourdomain.com>

and then once the subsystem maintainer merges it into his tree, they add
their own:

Signed-off-by: Subsystem Maintainer <superturboar...@linux-domain.org>

Sure, thanks very much.

Beyond that, what is the status of the other two feature improvement
patches..?

Do you intend to post those (again) as v4.12-rc1 material..?

Since the #2 has changed in V5, and the old #3 will have a conflict with it.

The #3 and #4 are still in reviewing process, so I will post it again if they are all okay later.

Thanks,

BRs
Xiubo




Reply via email to