On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > That seems to be overkill to me for the few drivers. And I suspect > > most of them would be better off now even using blk-mq private tags > > (which we'd have to implement for the legacy path first or just > > kill it off) but just not expose a tag per host to the scsi and block > > layers and set that aside. > > > IE not using blk-mq private tags for EH? Hmm. > But then we'd need a SCSI-internal mechanism to get one of them. I > really would want to avoid having each driver to implement it's own > mechanism on how to get a TMF tag; that sort of thing only leads to > copy-and-paste errors. > Ok; will be looking into it.
No, we don't. The driver simply sets a tag aside and doesn't expose it to the block layer. Similar to what smartpqi already does for LUN resets and AENs, mpt3sas does for the ioctl tags and NVMe does for AERs.
