Hey MNC,

On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 01:43 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 06/11/2017 04:02 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> > On 06/09/2017 01:11 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> >> Hi Bryant & Co,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 09:28 -0500, Bryant G. Ly wrote:
> >>> From: "Bryant G. Ly" <b...@us.ibm.com>
> >>>
> >>> This patch consists of adding a netlink to allow for reconfiguration
> >>> of a device in tcmu.
> >>>
> >>> It also changes and adds some attributes that are reconfigurable:
> >>> write_cache, device size, and device path.
> >>>
> >>> V2 - Fixes kfree in tcmu: Make dev_config configurable
> >>> V3 - Fixes spelling error
> >>> V4 - change strcpy to strlcpy for tcmu_dev_path_store and move
> >>>      tcmu_reconfig_type into target_core_user.h
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Bryant G. Ly (5):
> >>>   tcmu: Support emulate_write_cache
> >>>   tcmu: Add netlink for device reconfiguration
> >>>   tcmu: Make dev_size configurable via userspace
> >>>   tcmu: Make dev_config configurable
> >>>   tcmu: Add Type of reconfig into netlink
> >>>
> >>>  drivers/target/target_core_user.c     | 152 
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>>  include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h |   9 ++
> >>>  2 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> AFAICT, it looks like all of the review comments have been addressed in
> >> -v4.
> >>
> >> Applied to target-pending/for-next, with MNC's (pseudo) Reviewed-by's
> >> added for #3-#5.
> >>
> >> Please let me know if anything else needs to be changed.
> >>
> > 
> > The patches look ok. Thanks. Could you just merge the attached patch
> > into "[PATCH v4 5/5] tcmu: Add Type of reconfig into netlink" or into
> > the patchset after it? It just makes some of the names a little less
> > generic and only returns the reconfig attr for reconfig commands.
> > 
> 
> Actually Nick, do not merge the last patch. I have a lot more fixes/changes.
> 
> Bryant, could you test and adapt your userspace patches for the attached
> patch build over Nicks for-next branch.
> 
> Basically, the patch just has use pass the value being reconfigured with
> the netlink event. Along the way, it fixes a couple bugs.
> 
> Nick, when we have tested the patch, then I can submit as a formal
> patchset, or you can fold into the existing patches or whatever you prefer.
> 

Looking at merging your -v4 patches series here next:

[PATCH V4 00/10] target/tcmu: make tcmu netlink ops sync
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg15706.html

Do you still want me to drop the patch from Bryant below as mentioned
earlier..?

tcmu: Add Type of reconfig into netlink
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=28d44b983000754677155e46f6bdafc7b4d84213

Reply via email to