On 08/31/2017 02:19 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > No functional change. Nit: Then why do it? Perhaps the description can say why such a change is being done?
> > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > index 85f9a3e..135bdcf 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > @@ -501,11 +501,6 @@ static void fcoe_interface_cleanup(struct fcoe_interface > *fcoe) > struct net_device *netdev = fcoe->netdev; > struct fcoe_ctlr *fip = fcoe_to_ctlr(fcoe); > > - rtnl_lock(); > - if (!fcoe->removed) > - fcoe_interface_remove(fcoe); > - rtnl_unlock(); > - > /* Release the self-reference taken during fcoe_interface_create() */ > /* tear-down the FCoE controller */ > fcoe_ctlr_destroy(fip); > @@ -2140,6 +2135,11 @@ static void fcoe_destroy_work(struct work_struct *work) > cdev = fcoe_ctlr_to_ctlr_dev(ctlr); > > fcoe_if_destroy(port->lport); > + > + rtnl_lock(); > + if (!fcoe->removed) > + fcoe_interface_remove(fcoe); > + rtnl_unlock(); > fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe); > > mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex); > @@ -2254,6 +2254,8 @@ static int _fcoe_create(struct net_device *netdev, enum > fip_mode fip_mode, > printk(KERN_ERR "fcoe: Failed to create interface (%s)\n", > netdev->name); > rc = -EIO; > + if (!fcoe->removed) > + fcoe_interface_remove(fcoe); > rtnl_unlock(); > fcoe_interface_cleanup(fcoe); > mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex); > Looks good to me (other than the comment nit). Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <ldun...@suse.com> -- Lee Duncan SUSE Labs
