On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 18:36 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > There are a few functions which check for if the lock is held > (spin_lock_assert()) and the interrupts are disabled (irqs_disabled()). > > From looking at the code, each function is static, the caller is near by > > and does spin_lock_irq|safe(). As Linus puts it: > > > It's not like this is some function that is exported to random users, > > and we should check that the calling convention is right. > > > > This looks like "it may have been useful during coding to document > > things, but it's not useful long-term". > > Remove those checks.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@wdc.com>
