On 10/22/19 12:12 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
>> To be in-line with the other set_XX_byte() functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>
>> ---
>> include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
>> index 91bd749a02f7..6932d91472d5 100644
>> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
>> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
>> @@ -307,6 +307,11 @@ static inline struct scsi_data_buffer *scsi_prot(struct
>> scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>> #define scsi_for_each_prot_sg(cmd, sg, nseg, __i) \
>> for_each_sg(scsi_prot_sglist(cmd), sg, nseg, __i)
>>
>> +static inline void set_status_byte(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, char status)
>> +{
>> + cmd->result = (cmd->result & 0xffffff00) | status;
>
> Is sign-extension desirable here? Do callers need it?
>
It'll be a theoretical issue, as a status value with the top bit set
would be invalid anyway.
But for consistencies sake I'll make it an unsigned char in the next
iteration.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer
