--- Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > Also, any reason why you don't just use the NetLabel default domain
> > > mapping?
> >
> > Uh, only that I couldn't figure out how to go about doing so. If it
> > simplifies (there's that word again) things I'm all for it. I would
> > be happy to have my ignorance dispelled.
> 
> Two things:
> 
>  1. change "ndmp->domain = SMACK_CIPSO_DOMAIN_NAME" to "ndmp->domain = NULL"
>  2. change "netlbl_domhsh_add()" to "netlbl_domhsh_add_default()"
> 
> If you want to get really nitpicky the second step is optional, but I'd
> prefer 
> you use it in case we ever need to do something radically different for the 
> default NetLabel domain mapping (it's really easy as they take the same 
> arguments in the same order, just change the function name).

I gave these changes a try. netlbl_domhsh_add_default() returns
-EEXIST and packets are not getting labeled. Is it possible that
the default domain has to be cached?


Casey Schaufler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to