David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> wrote: > > the leap second support still looks a bit suspect, as mktime64 will convert > > mm/dd/YYYY HH/MM/60 and mm/dd/YYYY HH/MM+1/00 to the same time64_t, > > essentially meaning that two different inputs can yield the same output, > > possibly violating ASN.1 CER and DER rules. > > That's a 'bug' in mktime64() not my parsing of the ASN.1. If it's valid ASN.1 > then we should accept it.
Any thoughts on how to handle this? I really want to push this patch upstream. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
