On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:58:55AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> 
> Because the first patch modifies the struct public_key and removes the MPIs 
> from it,
> which the code modified in the second patch still uses. If bisect only takes 
> the first
> then the build will fail on the security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c as 
> reported by
> kbuild test robot:

Why not just leave the MPIs in the structure and only remove them
by adding a third patch?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to