On 6/23/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 6/22/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 22 2007 18:24, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > >
> > >> There have been discussions to remove the default-ys again, I've sent a
> > >> patch
> > >> [http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/12/216], but nothing happened.
> > >>
> > >> So, should all affected menuconfigs be transformed into tristates, what
> > >> do you think, Roman? Let me know so I can cook up a patch (hopefully
> > >> before 2.6.22) should they become tristate.
> > >
> > >Using bool is clearly a bug and I'd prefer if it removed the defaults as
> > >well.
> >
> > What I don't quite understand is, that CONFIG_CRYPTO is also a bool,
> > its subparts are tristates however, and there is no problem involved
> > with these.
>
> That's because neither CONFIG_CRYPTO nor any of the crypto modules
> depend on another symbol that is itself tristate (and hence can be modular),
> which is the case with all the problematic cases that have been posted to
> lkml lately.
To elaborate, the problem is:
menuconfig FOO
bool "FOO support drivers"
depends on BAR
if FOO
config BAZ
tristate "BAZ driver"
endif # FOO
Where:
config BAR
tristate "BAR subsystem"
The problem occurs when:
BAR=m
FOO=y (user selects FOO to show menu to be able to then select BAZ)
BAZ=y
BAZ would be built-in, BAR modular => build breakage. Note that it is
*BAZ* that depends on BAR. BAZ is *code* in the kernel sources, and
depends on BAR because it calls *code* exported by BAR (obviously).
[ We've marked _FOO_ as "depends on BAR" too, however, but that
is only because all the related drivers that this menu shows / hides
have the common property that they depend on BAR and hence there's
no point in showing this menu option to the user unless he has picked
BAR already.]
The root cause of the problem, as Randy Dunlap pointed out yesterday,
is a boolean coming in between the dependency chain of 2 tristates:
BAZ (tristate) depends on FOO (bool) depends on BAR (tristate).
BAR=m _does_ allow its dependency FOO to be "y", which then
allows BAZ (marked as dependency of only FOO but not BAR too,
sadly) to be "y".
Solution 1:
Make all FOO-like configmenu's trisate.
=> if BAR=m => FOO can only be m too => BAZ can only be m too.
But making a menuconfig symbol tristate is ugly, IMHO. These new
primitives are just on/off switches to show / hide a further menu that
contains related drivers / options, after all. They are bool's by meaning,
and need to defined / used as such too. [my opinion, fwiw]
Solution 2:
Explicitly honour the dependency of BAZ on BAR.
2.(a) do this either explicitly by adding "depends on" in kconfig itself:
config BAZ
tristate "BAZ driver"
depends on BAR
=> do this for all the config symbols inside any if FOO / endif block
where FOO depends on some other tristate symbol itself. But this
sounds (and feels like being) redundant.
2.(b) or else, make the config scripts "intelligent" so that if:
"menuconfig FOO depends on BAR", then:
All the "config BAZ"s inside this menuconfig (inside the if FOO /
endif block) also automatically "depend on" BAR too.
I would vote for solution 2.(b), personally, but solution 1 is easiest.
Satyam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
