On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Sam Liddicott wrote: > From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 10/08/07 04:30 > > =There's no way we could ever get a list of all good or all bad printers, > =so no matter what we do, we'd miss some :( > > But better to miss suspend on some than miss working altogether on others > surely? > > I never heard an outcry on lack if suspend that compares to that from those > whose USB devices stopped working when their distro upgraded the kernel.
Even if we don't handle printers right now, it would help to cover all scanners with a single class-wide quirks entry instead of lots of individual device entries. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
