On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:15 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > Looks OK to me ... except for one minor point, that I'd prefer not > to see platform devices registered on boards that don't support them. > In such cases they're just a waste of memory. Wasting a KByte here > and there does start to add up. > > For one reason or another, that's not the convention that seems to > be used on the PXA hardware.
Personally I totally agree but that really needs to be discussed on linux-arm-kernel with the other PXA developers. I know several people with several different problems all related to the way the pxa device structures are defined and registered. I will be trying to address those issues in due course, probably by replacing the pxa_set_ohci_info() function (and similar for the pxafb etc.) with a call returning the struct device which the board can do with as it pleases. This needs to be done in a different patch though. Can we apply this patch on that basis? Richard ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
